At some point we need to reign in the issues with nuclear weapons proliferation, and I'd say that time was yesterday. If we do not get this done now, history will show we were nothing more than fools. Some say that once the cat is out of the bag there is nothing you can do, but I wonder if that is an accurate assessment. To me it sounds like an excuse for those who are afraid to take a stand for what's right in the present period. Okay so let's talk about nuclear weapons proliferation in the Middle East and Asia briefly.
With regards to India, well, both China and Pakistan have nuclear power, and Mayanmar was developing nuclear weapons, just as North Korea was/is. India would have gotten the nuclear power and unfortunately nuclear weapons anyway eventually. And Pakistan has missiles pointed at them right now, and that I am very concerned with considering the Pakistani's weak government, and unacceptable behavior and infiltration of hostile folks.
Iran is a problem, so was Iraq with nuclear power and their former push for nuclear weapons thanks to the French and Russians, this is why Israel bombed that facility. Iran had help from various countries including French and Germans, now Russians. Syria had help too from North Korea, and scientists assisted and collaborated from Iran as well, and the Israelis bombed that too, Syria denied it was a nuclear facility, then changed their minds claimed it was only a nuclear power station.
Indeed, I personally am VERY pro-nuclear power, by grandfather was a nuclear physicist. I believe it makes sense and the new exploits that the Gates Foundation was looking into makes sense, less challenges with storage issues, as the fuel rods can be spent down by another huge percentage. The Fukishima incident was horrible and really bad considering that within a decade or more nuclear power will be quite reliable for humans. No nation should jump to conclusion if they have the most modern nuclear power plant facilities and plans, it's clean energy after all.
We have the IAEA for a reason, as it keeps things safe, and keeps "humans" from getting dumb ideas about building more nuclear weapons. The world doesn't need that, not with all the rogue nations out there or with proxy terrorist groups. The Arab League, all of those nations are seeking nuclear power, but you must understand, I will not put Iran in the same category as the others, as those other nations in the Middle East are not supporting proxy terrorist organization, or making nuclear weapons and promising to blow fellow human civilizations off the map.
There is a difference between peaceful nuclear power, and nuclear technology for war purposes, and it's quite clear where Iran stands on that. So, "we" or the whole-world must stand against that, and them, and based on previous behavior they cannot be trusted. So the answer is NO. Regardless of what Iran may promise, their promises are meaningless, and hold no value.
In Iran's case, previously they were doing quite well, but look how their nation has sunk backwards, how terrible, things were once going well there. With the way things are now, without a different mindset, regime change, it's all ruined, and cannot progress, and certainly should not be allowed to progress with nuclear weapons. Please consider all this.
A nuclear scientist explains the potential impact of an Iran deal by Al Jazeera English
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6683194
With regards to India, well, both China and Pakistan have nuclear power, and Mayanmar was developing nuclear weapons, just as North Korea was/is. India would have gotten the nuclear power and unfortunately nuclear weapons anyway eventually. And Pakistan has missiles pointed at them right now, and that I am very concerned with considering the Pakistani's weak government, and unacceptable behavior and infiltration of hostile folks.
Iran is a problem, so was Iraq with nuclear power and their former push for nuclear weapons thanks to the French and Russians, this is why Israel bombed that facility. Iran had help from various countries including French and Germans, now Russians. Syria had help too from North Korea, and scientists assisted and collaborated from Iran as well, and the Israelis bombed that too, Syria denied it was a nuclear facility, then changed their minds claimed it was only a nuclear power station.
Indeed, I personally am VERY pro-nuclear power, by grandfather was a nuclear physicist. I believe it makes sense and the new exploits that the Gates Foundation was looking into makes sense, less challenges with storage issues, as the fuel rods can be spent down by another huge percentage. The Fukishima incident was horrible and really bad considering that within a decade or more nuclear power will be quite reliable for humans. No nation should jump to conclusion if they have the most modern nuclear power plant facilities and plans, it's clean energy after all.
We have the IAEA for a reason, as it keeps things safe, and keeps "humans" from getting dumb ideas about building more nuclear weapons. The world doesn't need that, not with all the rogue nations out there or with proxy terrorist groups. The Arab League, all of those nations are seeking nuclear power, but you must understand, I will not put Iran in the same category as the others, as those other nations in the Middle East are not supporting proxy terrorist organization, or making nuclear weapons and promising to blow fellow human civilizations off the map.
There is a difference between peaceful nuclear power, and nuclear technology for war purposes, and it's quite clear where Iran stands on that. So, "we" or the whole-world must stand against that, and them, and based on previous behavior they cannot be trusted. So the answer is NO. Regardless of what Iran may promise, their promises are meaningless, and hold no value.
In Iran's case, previously they were doing quite well, but look how their nation has sunk backwards, how terrible, things were once going well there. With the way things are now, without a different mindset, regime change, it's all ruined, and cannot progress, and certainly should not be allowed to progress with nuclear weapons. Please consider all this.
A nuclear scientist explains the potential impact of an Iran deal by Al Jazeera English
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6683194
